A joint project, set up in response to the pandemic, between the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and the Department for Levelling Up Housing and Communities (DLUHC), was created in the County Court service to resolve disputes, sustain tendencies, and reduce pressure on the courts. However, there were just 0.73% of potential referrals which indicates a lack of awareness and communication of the scheme by Duty Advisors in the County Court, with only nine going through to the Rental Mediation Service.
The general consensus of participants in the pilot, referenced in the Rental Mediation Service Pilot: Post Implementation Review, discusses how mediation was offered too late in the possession process. It was offered after relations between tenant and landlord had fully broken down, and the case had already progressed to the court stage.
Participants also reported tenants did not have specialist legal advice during mediation making it confusing and overwhelming for all parties involved.
Propertymark believes there is a missed opportunity to include Local Authority housing and homelessness departments in the referral process, who are usually in contact with tenants at a much earlier stage and may be able to deliver guidance and signposting to the scheme.
Mediation needs to be implemented at an earlier stage, as it could delay possession proceedings and cause more issues from tenants.
If effectively implemented, the Rental Mediation Service would also be beneficial for landlords not wanting to lose good tenants, who are happy to engage in order to resolve disputes.
Propertymark’s recommendations for the future of renting
The UK Government plans to reform the private rented sector (PRS) in England and to help shape and influence the Renters’ Reforms, Propertymark has produced a paper outlining its position.