Despite criticism from renters’ groups that protections for tenants had been watered down, Jacob Young, MP, stated that the Bill strikes a fair balance, further commenting that measures that were bad for landlords would not be good for tenants.
Section 21 and the court system
The ban on no-fault evictions has been the most high-profile aspect of the Bill since it was first announced and continues to dominate the mainstream press coverage. The Bill now requires an assessment of the readiness of the courts before Section 21 can be abolished.
Young said that the courts must be ready, or tenants will not benefit from the changes to eviction rules, adding that the UK Government has already allocated £1.2 million for the Courts and Tribunals service to deliver a new end-to-end online possession service.
When questioned by Clive Betts, MP, Chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, Young rejected the idea of a dedicated housing court, saying that the judiciary did not support this approach.
The Minister also stated that the UK Government was looking at whether serious eviction cases such as those involving anti-social behaviour can be prioritised and will explore options for doing this after the Bill has gained Royal Assent.
Selective licensing is likely to stay
Young indicated that there is no plan to scrap HMO or selective licensing after the Bill is introduced. Instead, it is intended that they will be used differently to target specific local issues.
To prevent duplication with the new Property Portal, the UK Government will conduct a review of the licensing regime, claiming they will look to reduce burdens on landlords.
More work to do on fixed terms
The latest amendment has improved the picture for student lets. If it’s made clear at the start of a tenancy, and all the residents of a property are students, landlords will be able to use the student possession ground to evict tenants in line with the academic year. This will apply to any property, not just HMOs.
Propertymark is, however, disappointed to see the proposed amendment from Anthony Mangnall MP overlooked, which would have allowed a fixed-term contract to be agreed between landlords and tenants on an individual basis.
We have long argued that a fixed term allows security of tenure for the tenant and a guarantee of rent payments for the landlord. For tenants with low income or poor credit history, the fixed term allows a guarantor to be confident about the length of time they are signing up to support them. The complete removal of this option is likely to impact more vulnerable tenants the most.
The Bill faces more challenges in the Lords
Matthew Pennycook, MP, Shadow Housing Minister responded by saying that the Bill is no longer fit for purpose and must be re-balanced in favour of tenants. He claimed it will still allow the minority of disreputable landlords to exploit tenants and jeopardise their security of tenure.
Labour intends to continue to press for many of the amendments they tabled in the Commons committee which the UK Government rejected. These include increasing the minimum notice period for de facto no-fault possession grounds from two months to four months, removing ground 8a for repeated rent arrears, prohibiting rental bidding wars, and extending Awaabs Law to the PRS.
Working for our members
Propertymark has actively engaged with MPs about the content of the Bill, responded to the consultation, and given evidence to parliamentary committees throughout its progress so far.
The legislation must help to increase the supply of homes to rent and Propertymark will continue this work with MPs in the Lords, championing the role of property agents and ironing out further unintended consequences to ensure the legislation works in practice for all.
Renters' Rights Bill
The Renters’ Rights Bill was introduced to the UK Parliament on 11 September 2024, will ban Section 21 evictions, and introduce a new tenancy regime and new requirements for property standards and rent increases.